Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Miller v. Abramson

Appeals Court of Massachusetts, Middlesex

August 29, 2019

Gary MILLER & another[1]
v.
Christoffer ABRAMSON & another.[2]

         Argued January 11, 2019.

         [131 N.E.3d 864] Real Property, Adverse possession, Boundary.

          CIVIL ACTION commenced in the Superior Court Department on June 15, 2016. The case was heard by Thomas P. Billings, J.

         Jeffrey P. Allen (Katharin M. Unke Smith also present) for the defendants.

         Leonard M. Davidson, Newton, for the plaintiffs.

         Present: Massing, Desmond, & McDonough, JJ.

          OPINION

         McDONOUGH, J.

          The defendants, Christoffer and Cheryl Marie Abramson, appeal from a judgment declaring that the plaintiffs, Arlene and Gary Miller, acquired by adverse possession a thin slice of the Abramsons’ land situated just across the parties’ shared

Page 829

lot line. The Abramsons argue that the Millers’ [131 N.E.3d 865] only open and adverse use of the disputed area occurring continuously for the required time period amounts to nothing more than basic suburban landscaping -- mowing, fertilizing, and occasional trimming of trees and shrubs. The Abramsons claim that under Massachusetts law, this sort of yard work is simply not enough to satisfy the elements of adverse possession. We disagree and affirm.

         Background .

         The facts we recite are taken from the judge’s findings, made after a jury-waived trial, and are supplemented by uncontroverted evidence in the record.[3] The plaintiff Millers live in a single-family home at 11 Fellsmere Road in Newton, on a corner lot at the intersection with Ward Street. The defendant Abramsons live at 211 Ward Street in Newton. Fellsmere Road dead-ends onto Ward Street. As shown in the plan of land we include as an appendix to this opinion, the back of the Millers’ property directly abuts one side line of the Abramsons’ lot. The parties’ shared lot line is straight, running from Ward Street to the back of the Abramsons’ property. The area disputed by the parties forms a thin triangle, about 492 square feet in size, the base of which is along the Abramsons’ back lot line and one side of which is along the parties’ shared lot line.

         The Millers’ use and occupation of the disputed land was interrupted for purposes of adverse possession by June 15, 2016, when the Millers filed this action, in which the Abramsons counterclaimed. See Pugatch v. Stoloff, 41 Mass.App.Ct. 536, 542 n.8, 671 N.E.2d 995 (1996) (complaint to establish title immediately interrupts adverse possession). Accordingly, the Millers’ goal at the parties’ jury-waived trial was to prove their continuous use and occupation of the disputed area[4] over a twenty-year period prior to or ending in June 2016.[5] See G. L. c. 260, § 21.

          The Millers purchased their home in 1986 and moved in the following year. At the time they moved in, there was a line of shrubs and small ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.