Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Toronto

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts

April 12, 2018

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
PHILIP TORONTO, Defendant.

          FINAL ORDER OF FORFEITURE

          F. DENNIS SAYLOR, IV UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         WHEREAS, on October 5, 2017, a federal grand jury sitting in the District of Massachusetts returned a two-count Indictment, charging defendant Philip Toronto (the "Defendant"), with Sexual Exploitation of Children, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251(a) and (e) (Counts One and Two);

         WHEREAS, the Indictment also included a forfeiture allegation, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2253, which provided notice that the United States intended to seek the forfeiture, upon conviction of the Defendant of one or more of offenses alleged in Counts One and Two of the Indictment, of any visual depiction described in sections 2251, 2251 A, 2252, 2252A, 2252B, or 2260 of Chapter 110 of Title 18, or any book, magazine, periodical, film, videotape, or other matter which contains any such visual depiction, which was produced, transported, mailed, shipped, or received in violation of Chapter 110 of Title 18; any property, real or personal, constituting or traceable to gross profits or other proceeds obtained from such offenses; and any property, real or personal, used or intended to be used to commit or to promote the commission of such offenses or any property traceable to such property;

         WHEREAS, the Indictment further provided that, if any of the above-described forfeitable property, as a result of any act or omission by the Defendant, (a) cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence; (b) has been transferred or sold to, or deposited with, a third party; (c) has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court; (d) has been substantially diminished in value; or (e) has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty, the United States is entitled to seek forfeiture of any other property of the Defendant, up to the value of such assets described in Paragraph 2 above, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2253(b), incorporating 21 U.S.C. § 853(p);

         WHEREAS, on November 21, 2017, at a hearing pursuant to Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the Defendant pled guilty to Counts One and Two of the Indictment;

         WHEREAS, this Court ordered the Defendant to forfeit the following Properties, pursuant to the terms of the Preliminary Order of Forfeiture:

(a) one Apple iPhone IMEI: 358357060424563;
(b) one Apple iPhone 6S Plus IMEI: 355735070594041;
(c) one Apple iPhone 4 with cracked screen;
(d) four Enfain 16GB thumb drives;
(e) one HP desktop computer, bearing serial number MXM3450YYN;
(f) one HP Pavilion Desktop Computer, bearing serial number 4OE12304IT;
(g) one Lexar thumb drive (black/red) 4GB;
(h) one Lexar thumb drive ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.