Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Kenneh v. Tompkins

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts

August 9, 2017

MOHAMED KENNEH, Petitioner,
v.
STEVEN W. TOMPKINS, Respondent.

          MEMORANDUM & ORDER

          Indira Talwani United States District Judge

         Pending before this court is Petitioner Mohamed Kenneh's Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [“Amended Petition”] [#28]. For the reasons set forth below, the Amended Petition is GRANTED.

         I. Factual and Procedural Background

         Petitioner is a native and citizen of Liberia who last entered the United States as a legal permanent resident on November 1, 2000. Am. Pet. 1 [#28]; Notice & Order Ex. 1, at 6, (“Decision to Continue Detention”) [#27-1]. Petitioner was subsequently convicted for violation of an abuse prevention order, and was served with a form 1-862 Notice to Appear pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(E)(ii). Id. On April 7, 2016, Petitioner was taken into ICE custody, and the order of removal issued on June 10, 2016, became final on July 11, 2016. Id.

         On August 1, 2016, ICE submitted a travel document request to the Embassy of Liberia. Id. On August 23, 2016, the Liberian government interviewed Petitioner. Decl. Deportation Officer David Scarberry (“First Scarberry Decl.”) ¶ 6 [#12-1]. On September 15, 2016, ICE's Boston Field Office issued a decision to continue detention, stating that if Petitioner had not been released or removed from the United States by January 7, 2017, ICE Headquarters would make a final decision regarding his custody. Pet. for Writ of Habeas Corpus Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, By Person Subject to Indefinite Immigration Detention (“Pet.”) ¶ 10 [#1]; Pet. Ex. 1, at 2 [#1-1].

         In October 2016, additional identity documents were submitted to the Liberian government, and on December 8, 2016, the Liberian government again interviewed Petitioner. First Scarberry Decl. ¶ 6 [#12-1]. On January 11, 2017, ICE advised Petitioner that it had reviewed his detention status, and concluded that Petitioner would not be released. Pet. ¶ 11 [#1]. ICE had not received the requested travel documents at that time, but nonetheless stated that “[a] travel document from the Government of Liberia is expected.” Pet. Ex. 1, at 3 [#1-1].

         Petitioner filed his petition for a writ of habeas corpus on March 23, 2017, stating that because he had been detained for over six months and there was not a significant likelihood of his removal in the reasonably foreseeable future, he should be released. See generally Pet. [#1]. On March 24, 2017, this court ordered Respondent to respond to the petition by April 14, 2017, and in any event, to give the court 48 hours' notice prior to any removal of Petitioner from the District of Massachusetts. Order [#4].

         Sometime in March 2017, additional identity documents were presented to the Liberian government. First Scarberry Decl. ¶ 6 [#12-1].

         On April 13, 2017, Respondent notified the court of ICE's intent to remove Petitioner from the District of Massachusetts to Louisiana on April 17, 2017, “for staging for his anticipated removal to Liberia.” Notice Intent Remove [#8]. The court ordered Respondent to file an affidavit “stating whether or not ICE has received the required travel documents from the Government of Liberia, and attesting whether or not Petitioner's imminent removal to Liberia is certain.” Order [#9].

         Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss [#11] on April 14, 2017, asserting that Petitioner's removal was “to be effectuated in the reasonably foreseeable future, ” and thus that the Petition should be dismissed. Mem. Supp. Mot. Dismiss 1-2 [#12]. In support of the motion (and presumably in response to the court's order), Deportation Officer David Scarberry (“Scarberry”) submitted a declaration stating that he met with the Liberian Embassy on April 13, 2017, and was informed that Liberia would not yet issue a travel document. First Scarberry Decl. ¶ 7 [#12-1]. Scarberry stated that in light of that fact, ICE had cancelled Petitioner's transfer to Louisiana. Id. He also stated that based on recent removal statistics regarding Liberians, he still believed that “there is a significant likelihood that the petitioner will be removed in the reasonably foreseeable future.” Id. ¶¶ 8-9. On May 8, 2017, Scarberry submitted a further declaration stating that ICE provided further information to the Liberian government on May 4, 2017, and that the Liberian government had informed ICE that it would make its decision after speaking with Petitioner's family. Decl. Deportation Officer David Scarberry (“Second Scarberry Decl.”) ¶¶ 8-9 [#17]. Scarberry further stated that ICE would schedule Petitioner's removal within two weeks of the date of issuance of the requested travel document. Id. ¶ 10. However, as of May 8, 2017, ICE had not yet received those documents.

         On May 9, 2017, this court held a hearing on Respondent's Motion to Dismiss [#11]. After the hearing, the court denied the Motion to Dismiss [#11] without prejudice, but allowed Respondent the opportunity to file a renewed motion at a later date. Order [#18].

         Respondent filed his Renewed Motion to Dismiss [#20] on May 16, 2017. In support of that motion, Scarberry submitted a further declaration, reporting that the Liberian government spoke with Petitioner's brother on May 8, 2017, and that on May 12, 2017, the Liberian government had informed ICE that it would decide prior to a June 12, 2017, scheduled charter flight to Liberia whether to issue a travel document for Petitioner. Third Decl. Deportation Officer David Scarberry (“Third Scarberry Decl.”) ¶¶ 11-12 [#21-1]. He further stated that ICE expected to remove Petitioner either on the June 12, 2017, charter flight, or within three weeks of the date of issuance of the travel document. Id. ¶ 13. However, ICE still had not yet received the requested travel document.

         On June 14, 2017, Respondent filed a Status Report and Notice of Intent to Remove [#25], explaining that the Liberian Embassy had issued the requested travel document on June 12, 2017, and that the Department of Homeland Security intended to remove Petitioner to Liberia via a charter flight scheduled for the week of July 17, 2017. Third [sic] Decl. Deportation Officer David Scarberry (“Fourth Scarberry Decl.”) ¶¶ 6-7 [#25-1]. Based on those representations, the court dismissed the Petition [#1]. Mem. & Order 5 [#26].

         On August 5, 2017, Petitioner filed an Amended Petition and Motion to Expedite Adjudication of Petition [#28]. The court granted the motion to expedite and set a hearing on the Amended Petition [#28] for August 8, 2017. Elec. Order [#30]. On August 8, 2017, Respondent filed a Fifth Declaration of Deportation Officer David Scarberry (“Fifth Scarberry Decl.”) [#31]. That declaration advised the court for the first time that the ICE charter flight scheduled for the week of July 17, 2017, “was unexpectedly cancelled and moved to the week of August 7.” Id. ¶ 7. Moreover, Petitioner was not placed on the August 7 flight, after ICE kept him off at the request of the Liberian Embassy. Id. ΒΆ 8. Scarberry now asserts that Petitioner is scheduled to be ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.