United States District Court, District of Massachusetts
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATHERINE A. ROBERTSON UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.
On March 19, 2015, Fritz Simeon (“Petitioner”), an immigration detainee currently held at the Franklin County Jail and House of Correction in Greenfield, Massachusetts, filed a self-prepared “Motion to Vacate Conviction” that was docketed as a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Docket No. 1). Petitioner challenges his July 23, 2008 guilty plea to indecent assault, assault, and attempted rape on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel. See Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010) (failure to warn of immigration consequences of guilty plea is ineffective assistance of counsel).
Petitioner also filed a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Docket No. 2), which was referred to this court the same day. For the reasons set forth below, the court (1) denies without prejudice petitioner’s Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; (2) directs the Clerk of Court to correct the Respondent in this matter to the proper party; and (3) orders the proper Respondent to file an answer or other responsive pleading.
A party filing a habeas action in this court must either (1) pay the $5.00 filing fee for habeas corpus actions; or (2) seek leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. See Fee Schedule for the District of Massachusetts ($5.00 fee to file writ of habeas corpus); 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (fees); 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (proceeding in forma pauperis). A motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, or to proceed without prepayment of fees, must be accompanied by “a certificate from the warden or other appropriate officer of the place of confinement showing the amount of money or securities that the petitioner has in any account in the institution.” Rule 3(a) of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases.
Here, although petitioner has completed and submitted the proper application to proceed without prepayment of fees, he has failed to submit a certified prison account statement in support of his motion. The attached exhibit, titled “Financial Affidavit, ” is insufficient. Thus, petitioner’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied without prejudice to his submitting his prison accounts statement.
Further, because Petitioner is seeking habeas corpus relief, whether pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 or 28 U.S.C. § 2241, the State of Massachusetts is not the proper party to be named as Respondent. Rather, Franklin County Sheriff Christopher P. Donelan is the correct party, as he is “the individual having day-to-day control over the facility in which [Petitioner] is being detained.” Vasquez v. Reno, 233 F.3d 688, 696 (1st Cir. 2000); see Rumsfeld v. Padilla, 542 U.S. 426, 447 (2004) (“Whenever a § 2241 habeas petitioner seeks to challenge his present physical custody within the United States, he should name his warden as respondent and file the petition in the district of confinement.”); Rule 2(a) of the Rules Governing Habeas Corpus Cases Under Section 2254 (“If the petitioner is currently in custody under a state-court judgment, the petition must name as respondent the state officer who has custody.”).
Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that:
1. The Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Docket No. 2) is DENIED without prejudice. If petitioner wishes to proceed with this action, within 21 days of the date of this Order, he either must (1) pay the $5.00 filing fee; or (2) file a certified prison account statement with the court. Failure of petitioner to comply with this directive may result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. The clerk shall send a copy of this Order to the Treasurer’s Office of the prison facility where petitioner is detained, in order to facilitate any request by petition for his certified prison account statement;
2. The Clerk of this Court shall correct the named Respondent from State of Massachusetts to Christopher P. Donelan;
3. The Clerk of this Court shall serve a copy of the Petition upon (i) Respondent; (ii) the office of the United States Attorney General, and (iii) the United States Attorney;
4. The Respondent shall, within 21 days of receipt of this Order, file an answer or other responsive pleading; and
5. The Respondent shall provide the court with at least 48 hours (i.e., 2 business days) advance notice of any scheduled removal of petitioner, and any scheduled ...