Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Shea v. Federal National Mortgage Association

Appeals Court of Massachusetts

February 18, 2015

Paul Shea
v.
Federal National Mortgage Association & others. [1]

Thomas B. Vawter for the plaintiff.

Marissa I. Delinks for Federal National Mortgage Association.

Scott C. Owens for Harmon Law Offices, P.C.

OPINION

[31 N.E.3d 1123] At issue is whether a judge properly dismissed[2] the plaintiff's claims[3] attacking the validity of a mortgage foreclosure to which Eaton v. Federal Natl. Mort. Assn., 462 Mass. 569, 969 N.E.2d 1118 (2012), does not apply.[4] The plaintiff contends tat the foreclosure was void because the mortgage was not validly assigned to OneWest Bank FSB (OneWest), the foreclosing mortgagee. He argues that the assignment was invalid because (1) the assignor never held the underlying note, and (2) the assignment was not specifically authorized by the owner of the debt.[5] We affirm.[6]

Background.[7]

The plaintiff (and another person who is not a party to this case) purchased the property at issue in April, 2005. In 2007, as part of a

Page 902

refinancing of the property, the plaintiff granted a mortgage to IndyMac Bank, FSB (IndyMac), to secure a loan in the amount of $281,600. In pertinent part, the 2007 mortgage contained the following provisions.

The mortgage defines IndyMac, which is the owner of the debt, as the " Lender." The mortgage defines Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. (MERS), as " a separate corporation that is acting solely as a nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns. MERS is the mortgagee under this Security Instrument " (emphasis in original).

A section entitled " TRANSFER OF RIGHTS IN THE PROPERTY" provides that the mortgage secures both the repayment [31 N.E.3d 1124] of the loan and the borrower's performance of covenants and agreements to the Lender. That section continues as follows:

" Borrower does hereby mortgage, grant and convey to MERS (solely as nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns) and to the successors and assigns of MERS, with power of sale ... .
" ...
" Borrower understands and agrees that MERS holds only legal title to the interests granted by Borrower in this Security Instrument, but, if necessary to comply with law or custom, MERS (as nominee for Lender and Lender's successors and assigns) has the right: to exercise any or all of those interests, including, but not limited to, the right to foreclose and sell the Property; and to take any action required of Lender including, but not limited to, releasing and canceling this Security Instrument." (Emphasis supplied.)

On November 11, 2009, MERS assigned the mortgage to OneWest, which, after other events we set out in the margin,[8] foreclosed the property under its power of sale. OneWest then assigned its successful bid to the Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) and ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.