Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Reddy v. Lowe's Companies, Inc.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts

November 18, 2014

MAUREEN REDDY, Plaintiff,
v.
LOWE'S COMPANIES, INC. and EVOLUTION LIGHTING, LLC, Defendants

For Maureen Reddy, Plaintiff, Counter Defendant: Eve Brown, LEAD ATTORNEY, Suffolk University, Boston, MA.

For Lowe's Companies, Inc., Defendant, Counter Claimant: Michael C. Cesarano, LEAD ATTORNEY, PRO HAC VICE, Feldman Gale PA, Miami, FL; Amanda S. Adams, Michael A. Oakes, Ozzie A Farres, Steven L. Wood, PRO HAC VICE, Hunton & Williams LLP, Washington, DC; Leonard C. Suchyta, Hunton & Williams LLP, Washington, DC.

For Evolution Lighting, LLC, Defendant: Michael C. Cesarano, LEAD ATTORNEY, PRO HAC VICE, Feldman Gale PA, Miami, FL; David S. Godkin, Birnbaum & Godkin, LLP, Boston, MA.

For Evolution Lighting, LLC, Counter Claimant: Michael C. Cesarano, LEAD ATTORNEY, PRO HAC VICE, Feldman Gale PA, Miami, FL; Andrew A. Caffrey, III, David S. Godkin, Birnbaum & Godkin, LLP, Boston, MA.

Page 250

MEMORANDUM

WILLIAM G. YOUNG, DISTRICT JUDGE.

I. INTRODUCTION

This Markman memorandum explains this Court's construction of design patent D677, 423 (the " '423 patent" ) which claims an " ornamental design for a bathroom vanity light shade." U.S. Patent No. D677, 423 (filed Mar. 8, 2012). Compl., Ex. A, ECF No. 1-2. On June 4, 2014, at a Markman hearing, this Court, acting on behalf of Judge Tauro to whom this case was originally drawn, orally construed the patent at bar. Pursuant to the Court's internal procedures, the case was subsequently transferred to Judge Talwani for

Page 251

all further proceedings. This memorandum details the Court's reasoning.

A. Procedural History

The plaintiff, Maureen Reddy (" Reddy" ), brings suit against Lowe's Companies, Inc. and Evolution Lighting, LLC (collectively, the " Defendants" ), accusing the Defendants of infringing her design patent. Compl. 6. The parties filed preliminary claim construction briefs on April 30, 2014. Defs.' Br. Claim Construction (" Defs.' Opening Br." ), ECF No. 29; Pl.'s Opening Claim Construction Br. (" Pl.'s Opening Br." ), ECF No. 31. The Defendants replied on May 16, 2014. Defs.' Reply Pl.'s Br. Claim Construction (" Defs.' Reply" ), ECF No. 37. Reddy filed her reply brief on May 29, 2014. Pl.'s Reply Defs.' Br. Claim Construction (" Pl.'s Reply" ), ECF No. 38.

This Court held a Markman hearing on June 4, 2014, at which time it adopted the claim construction discussed in this memorandum. See Elec. Clerk's Notes, June 4, 2014, ECF No. 42. The next day, June 5, 2014, this case was transferred to Judge Talwani's session of the Court. Elec. Notice, June 5, 2014, ECF No. 41. Following the Markman hearing and the reassignment, the parties continued to litigate the case in Judge ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.