Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

CNE Direct, Inc. v. Blackberry Corp.

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts

October 28, 2014

CNE DIRECT, INC., Plaintiff,
v.
BLACKBERRY CORPORATION f/k/a RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION and ASSET RECOVERY ASSOCIATES WORLDWIDE, LTD., Defendants

October 27, 2014

For CNE Direct Inc., Plaintiff: Dana A. Zakarian, LEAD ATTORNEY, Nystrom Beckman & Paris LLP, One Marina Park Drive, 15th Flr., Boston, MA.

For Blackberry Corporation, formerly known as Research in Motion Corporation, Defendant: Donald K. Stern, LEAD ATTORNEY, Cooley LLP, Boston, MA; Sanford F. Remz, Yurko Salvesen & Remz, P.C., One Washington Mall, Boston, MA.

Asset Recovery LTD, Defendant, Pro se.

Page 234

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT

F. Dennis Saylor IV, United States District Judge.

This is a contract dispute arising out of an alleged agreement to sell mobile phone memory parts. Plaintiff CNE Direct, Inc. (" CNE" ) contends that the defendants breached the agreement, directly costing CNE the profit it would have earned from an arranged resale. Plaintiff brought claims for breach of contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and violation of Mass. Gen. Laws ch. 93A. Plaintiff has obtained an entry of default against defendant Asset Recovery Associates Worldwide, Ltd. and has moved for a default judgment.

I. Analysis

Where a party has obtained an entry of default, the Court must determine the amount of damages unless it is a " sum certain." Fed.R.Civ.P. 55(b)(2). The party that has defaulted is deemed to have admitted all of the allegations in the complaint. See Pizzo v. Gambee, 810 F.Supp.2d 345, 347 (D. Mass. 2011) (citing Multi Tech., Inc. v. Mitchell Mgmt. Sys., Inc., 25 Mass.App.Ct. 333, 334-35, 518 N.E.2d 854 (1988)).

Taking the allegations in the complaint as true, defendant's breach cost CNE hundreds of thousands of dollars in resale profits. The contracts for resale are attached to the complaint and reveal a resale price of $7,594,500. CNE's affidavit, filed with the Court in conjunction with its motion for default judgment, calculates the expected net profit from that sale to be $851,034. On the evidence before the Court, this is the proper damage award for lost profits.

CNE is also entitled to an award of reasonable attorneys' fees and taxable costs under chapter 93A. Mass. Gen. Laws. ch. 93A § 11. Plaintiff's attorneys filed an affidavit with the Court in which they provide invoices displaying attorneys' fees in the amount of $139,961. The Court finds that these fees are reasonable under the circumstances.

The affidavits also detail taxable costs of $6,430.86, including $1,026.25 for computerized legal research. The Court accepts the valuation of taxable costs, other than the value ascribed to computerized legal research. Thus, the award for costs will be $5,404.61.

Plaintiff is also entitled to prejudgment interest pursuant to Mass. Gen. Laws. ch. 231 ยง 6C. The rate of interest is twelve percent per annum from the date of the breach. The breach in this case occurred on November 27, 2013, meaning that eleven months have passed as of the date of ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.