Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Donovan v. Kelley

United States District Court, D. Massachusetts

June 30, 2014

PETER J. DONOVAN, Plaintiff,
v.
WILLIAM KELLEY, as an individual and in his official capacity as Legal Counsel of the Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission; CAROLINE GUARINO-WILICHOSKI, as an individual and in her official capacity as Investigator of the Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission; KIM GAINSBORO, as an individual and in her official capacity as Chairman of the Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission; ROBERT CRONIN, as an individual and in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission; SUSAN CORCORAN, as an individual and in her official capacity as Commissioner of the Massachusetts Alcoholic Beverages Control Commission, Defendants.

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON MOTION TO DISMISS BY DEFENDANTS (#10) AND PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AGAINST ABCC AND IT EMPLOYEES (#31)

ROBERT B. COLLINGS, Magistrate Judge.

In view of the recommendation contained in the Report and Recommendation (#40) on the defendants' (later filed) motion to dismiss (#27), I RECOMMEND that the (earlier filed) Motion to Dismiss by Defendants (#10) and Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction (#31) be found to be MOOT.

Review by the District Judge

The parties are hereby advised that any party who objects to this recommendation must file a specific written objection thereto with the Clerk of this Court within 14 days of the party's receipt of this Report and Recommendation. The written objections must specifically identify the portion of the recommendation, or report to which objection is made and the basis for such objections. The parties are further advised that the United States Court of Appeals for this Circuit has repeatedly indicated that failure to comply with Rule 72(b), Fed. R. Civ. P., shall preclude further appellate review. See Keating v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 848 F.2d 271 (1st Cir. 1988); United States v. Emiliano Valencia-Copete, 792 F.2d 4 (1st Cir. 1986); Scott v. Schweiker, 702 F.2d 13, 14 (1st Cir. 1983); United States v. Vega, 678 F.2d 376, 378-379 (1st Cir., 1982); Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co., 616 F.2d 603 (1st Cir. 1980); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.